DDAM LLMIndependent research · AI × DAM

Topic 02 · AI Tagging

AI Tagging.

The vendor-neutral research index for AI image tagging. Capability matrices across classical computer-vision APIs (Google, AWS, Azure, Clarifai, Imagga, Hive, Cloudinary) and frontier multimodal LLMs (Anthropic Claude, OpenAI GPT-4o, Google Gemini). Same rubric. Same month. Public docs only.

1 report11 statistics4 cited from external research1 report in preparation

Featured report

Statistics — featured (cited from external research)

Statistics — from the AI Tagging Provider Index (capability slices)

In preparation

  • Report 05 · In preparation

    AI Tagging Accuracy Field Study

    Precision, recall, and human-agreement rates of LLM-generated creative tags across 10,000+ human-verified assets. Per category, per model. Drops Q3 2026.

    Q3 2026

What we're publishing on this topic

AI tagging is the most-claimed feature in 2026 DAM and creative-tooling marketing, and the least-rigorously-benchmarked in the same year's journalism. The Provider Index (Report 03) measures the capability surface of every major image-tagging API — what they can do, where they hide pricing, where the classical-CV vs frontier-LLM split shows up. The Accuracy Field Study (Report 05, in preparation) will measure what tags they actually produce, scored against human-verified ground truth. Both reports re-verify on a published cadence; corrections from providers fold in within 7 days.

If you build on a vision API and want to nominate a provider for the next index revision, or share a behavioural data point we should incorporate, mail the team via the About page.